Comparisons & Reviews
Head-to-head comparisons · which AI builder writes the most secure code, scanner vs penetration test, and what each tool really checks.
- Free vs Pro Scan: What's the Difference? · SimplyScan's free scan covers the three highest-impact categories · exposed secrets, frontend security headers, and Supabase misconfigurations · with full findings and fixes, no paywall. Pro expands to 14 categories and 51+ checks, adding auth, authorization, injection, CSRF, dependencies, AI security, and a PDF report. Upgrade once your app handles real user data.
- SimplyScan vs Built-In Platform Security: What Lovable, Cursor, Bolt, Replit & Windsurf Actually Check · Built-in platform security is partial at best: Lovable checks secrets, dependencies, and Supabase RLS but skips 10 categories; Replit adds SAST and dependency scanning; Bolt runs basic pre-deploy audits; Cursor and Windsurf have no code scanner at all. SimplyScan covers 13 categories and 40+ checks on any deployed app, filling the gaps every platform leaves.
- SimplyScan vs Penetration Testing: When You Need Each · SimplyScan and penetration testing are complementary. Automated scanning delivers results in minutes, runs on every deploy, and catches common issues like exposed keys and missing headers for a fraction of the cost. Pen tests ($5,000 to $50,000, one to four weeks) find business logic flaws scanners miss. Scan continuously · add an annual pen test once you handle sensitive data.
- Bolt.new vs Lovable vs Cursor: Which Produces the Most Secure Code? · Lovable produces the most secure code out of the box because it generates RLS policies and complete auth flows by default · Cursor is safest for experienced developers who specify security requirements · Bolt.new needs the most hardening. All three optimize for functionality over security, so every AI-built app still needs a security review before production.
- Windsurf vs Cursor: Which AI IDE Writes More Secure Code? · Neither IDE writes safer code: both run the same frontier models, so Windsurf and Cursor produce the same classes of vulnerabilities. They fail differently · Windsurf's Cascade ships one big unreviewed diff, Cursor accumulates a thousand small accepted edits. Your review gate, rules files, and a post-deploy scan matter more than the tool choice.
- Best Vulnerability Scanners for Vibe-Coded Apps in 2026 · For AI-built apps, combine tools by layer: SimplyScan scans the deployed app with 51+ checks tuned to AI failure modes and reports in plain English, OWASP ZAP gives free DAST depth if you learn it, Snyk covers vulnerable dependencies, Semgrep runs source rules in CI, and Burp Suite suits professional pentesters.
- The Best AI Code Security Tools in 2026 · What Actually Catches AI-Written Bugs · The best AI code security tools fall into five categories: SAST (Semgrep, CodeQL), secret scanners (gitleaks, TruffleHog), dependency and supply-chain checkers (Snyk, Socket), DAST scanners (OWASP ZAP), and no-setup black-box scanners like SimplyScan. Vibe coders should start with a black-box scan of the deployed app, then add secret and dependency scanning.
Browse other categories: Platform Security Guides · Vulnerabilities & Fixes · Database & API Security · Security Checklists · Speed & Performance · AI Coding Security · Security Fundamentals
All security guides